<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Merits of Bad Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marcusvorwaller.com/blog/archives/2006/03/05/the-merits-of-bad-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marcusvorwaller.com/blog/archives/2006/03/05/the-merits-of-bad-design/</link>
	<description>Software, Mac and other Goodness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 11:33:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://marcusvorwaller.com/blog/archives/2006/03/05/the-merits-of-bad-design/comment-page-1/#comment-14636</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 23:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcusvorwaller.com/blog/archives/2006/03/05/the-merits-of-bad-design/#comment-14636</guid>
		<description>Toby, tasktoy is utilitarian and that&#039;s one of the reasons I use it. It just works. It&#039;s not ugly, but it&#039;s not beautiful either. It&#039;s is definitely apparent that a lot of thought went into the interface though, just not into making it look &quot;slick.&quot; I hope it doesn&#039;t sound like I&#039;m complaining, I use it daily and think it&#039;s great.

Good point with Apple though--they seem to have found the perfect combination of functionality and design. Maybe that&#039;s why they are so successful? Too many companies lean too heavily on one or the other (design or functionality) and aren&#039;t able to find that balance. 

Henry, Just to reiterate, I don&#039;t think Google is poorly designed, but it&#039;s definitely not flashy or really well designed--just simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toby, tasktoy is utilitarian and that&#8217;s one of the reasons I use it. It just works. It&#8217;s not ugly, but it&#8217;s not beautiful either. It&#8217;s is definitely apparent that a lot of thought went into the interface though, just not into making it look &#8220;slick.&#8221; I hope it doesn&#8217;t sound like I&#8217;m complaining, I use it daily and think it&#8217;s great.</p>
<p>Good point with Apple though&#8211;they seem to have found the perfect combination of functionality and design. Maybe that&#8217;s why they are so successful? Too many companies lean too heavily on one or the other (design or functionality) and aren&#8217;t able to find that balance. </p>
<p>Henry, Just to reiterate, I don&#8217;t think Google is poorly designed, but it&#8217;s definitely not flashy or really well designed&#8211;just simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toby</title>
		<link>http://marcusvorwaller.com/blog/archives/2006/03/05/the-merits-of-bad-design/comment-page-1/#comment-14633</link>
		<dc:creator>toby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 22:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcusvorwaller.com/blog/archives/2006/03/05/the-merits-of-bad-design/#comment-14633</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m the creator of tasktoy, and after reading Scoble&#039;s article, I think I&#039;ll leave the aesthetics as is :)

I should point out that tasktoy that I did think very carefully about the interface to tasktoy so it would require very few mouseclicks and for everything to be extremely obvious. I like to think that the number of users telling me &quot;it just works like my brain works&quot; means that I was somewhat successful.

I believe that L&amp;F and usability are both aspects of design. Apple&#039;s products may be beautiful, but they&#039;re also intuitive. To which would you attribute their success?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m the creator of tasktoy, and after reading Scoble&#8217;s article, I think I&#8217;ll leave the aesthetics as is <img src='http://marcusvorwaller.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I should point out that tasktoy that I did think very carefully about the interface to tasktoy so it would require very few mouseclicks and for everything to be extremely obvious. I like to think that the number of users telling me &#8220;it just works like my brain works&#8221; means that I was somewhat successful.</p>
<p>I believe that L&amp;F and usability are both aspects of design. Apple&#8217;s products may be beautiful, but they&#8217;re also intuitive. To which would you attribute their success?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: henry</title>
		<link>http://marcusvorwaller.com/blog/archives/2006/03/05/the-merits-of-bad-design/comment-page-1/#comment-14592</link>
		<dc:creator>henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 15:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcusvorwaller.com/blog/archives/2006/03/05/the-merits-of-bad-design/#comment-14592</guid>
		<description>Interesting that you see functionality as seperate from design. Maybe this is why I can&#039;t create an attractive webpage: I see the function as not just a part of the design, but as the focal point. So I create fairly good functional designs/layouts that are inherently ugly.
Maybe I need to work towards a balance (buzzword concept of the century).

It&#039;s also why I think you&#039;re crazy for having Google in a list of bad designs!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that you see functionality as seperate from design. Maybe this is why I can&#8217;t create an attractive webpage: I see the function as not just a part of the design, but as the focal point. So I create fairly good functional designs/layouts that are inherently ugly.<br />
Maybe I need to work towards a balance (buzzword concept of the century).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also why I think you&#8217;re crazy for having Google in a list of bad designs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RJ</title>
		<link>http://marcusvorwaller.com/blog/archives/2006/03/05/the-merits-of-bad-design/comment-page-1/#comment-14579</link>
		<dc:creator>RJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 05:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcusvorwaller.com/blog/archives/2006/03/05/the-merits-of-bad-design/#comment-14579</guid>
		<description>You list Tasktoy as a site that you find indispensible. It is a simple well put together site and you are right, design awards will not come its way very soon.

I cam across another online task management app site called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rememberthemilk.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Remember the Milk&gt;&lt;/a&gt; which you may find interesting.

I have used Tasktoy and Remember The Milk (RTM) and find RTM to be more functionally useful to me, now, then TaskToy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You list Tasktoy as a site that you find indispensible. It is a simple well put together site and you are right, design awards will not come its way very soon.</p>
<p>I cam across another online task management app site called <a href="http://www.rememberthemilk.com" rel="nofollow">Remember the Milk&gt;</a> which you may find interesting.</p>
<p>I have used Tasktoy and Remember The Milk (RTM) and find RTM to be more functionally useful to me, now, then TaskToy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

